|

Policy Briefs Links

Elimination of sales...

Two bills introduced in January would eliminate the sales tax and use tax on the purchase of energy conservation products.

Large tax incentives for carbon sequestration?

A recent bill introduced in the House would create a large tax break for implementing a carbon sequestration system.

Major tax incentives for renewable energy proposed

A proposed House bill would provide major tax incentives for homeowners to install renewable energy systems.

$20,000 tax credits for alternative fuel pumps

Gas station owners can receive up to $20,000 in tax credits towards installing alternative fuel pumps at their stations.

Laundry and dish was...

Two bills that passed on the last day of the 94th Legislature will require that laundry and dish washing detergents designed for home use not contain more than 0.5% phosphorus.

Proposed act would g...

A proposed bill would require that the large utility companies enter into contracts with all eligible renewable energy projects. The contracts would last at least 20 years and guarantee a "reasonable profit" for the electricity produced.

Single website will ...

The Department of Agriculture will be required to put together a website which shows in a concise and readable fashion the procedural steps that would need to be taken to build an alternative fuel production plant in Michigan.

Renewable energy ren...

The amount of renewable energy renaissance zones will be increased from 10 to 15. At least five of these zones must be designated for the production of cellulosic biofuels.

SB 1048 passes, crea...

This bill creates a tax incentive program for residential improvements that would increase a home's energy efficiency.

SB 1585 introduced, ...

This bill would allow the Department of Treasury to hand out grants for renewable energy research. Funding would come from DNR contracts for oil and natural gas exploration on state land.
Detroit Incinerator vs. Landfills and Recycling Programs PDF Print E-mail
Written by Natalie Tononi   
Wednesday, 03 November 2010 18:07

          Detroit is home to the largest incinerator in the world, burning nearly 800,000 tons of waste a year and producing 68 megawatts of electricity per hour. This waste is then converted in to steam from natural gas and sold to Detroit Thermal and other similar companies. Detroit Thermal relies heavily on this steam to provide for the 145 buildings that depend on this steam for heating and cooling purposes.

           In 2003, Detroit Thermal bought this massive steam loop and since has put $35 million worth of improvements into it. When the original purchase was made a contract was set up that was good until October 1st, 2010. Failure to negotiate a new contract has caused the incinerator to go into shutdown mode as of October 8th. Due to this failure, more and more arguments have arisen against the rebooting of this system. Prior to the closing, though, Detroit's trash incinerator was in a debt of $1 billion that was supposed to be paid off by July 2009. City Council voted to provide $24 million to continue the incinerator project.

           In fall 2006, 10 community/environmental groups fused together to form what is now called the Coalition for a New Business Model for Detroit Solid Wastes. This group has been one of many to challenge the reopening of the incinerator. Individuals such as Mayor Bing sees it as a financial liability. On the other hand, most that are against it have environmental reasons why. Noah Hall, environmental law professor at Wayne State University Law School and Executive Director of the Great Lakes Environmental Law Center in Detroit argues that the more than 800,000 tons of garbage burned a year are polluting the air that the citizens are breathing. Pollutants such as mercury, lead, and dioxins (nitrogen and sulfur) are not only a strong cause of global warming and acid rain, but are also the leading cause of the growing number of citizens with asthma. In addition, it creates more global warming carbon dioxide per unit of energy than and other fuel.

            The argument posed is that if the Detroit incinerator is shut down for good, recycling programs and landfills would take its place. City Councils vote to continue the incinerator would provide $1.7 million more than making the switch to recycling and landfills. Sandra Turner Handy of the Michigan Environmental Council is strongly against the decisions. Her view is that keeping the incinerator running would allow for more pollution, fewer jobs created, and a lack of interest in the health and safety of the people.

            The fact of the matter is, Detroit Thermal can still get all of its steam it needs without keeping the incinerator running because it is on a separate loop. Of the 30 largest cities in the United States, Detroit is the only one to not have curbside recycling. If the switch to landfills and recycling is made 200-300 jobs would be created immediately and thousands more could be in the near future. Residents may also be compensated for their participation in the recycling effort. All in all, it seems to be a win-win situation if the Detroit incinerator were to stay shutdown and the steam loop remain in tact.

 

Sources:

http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20101019/FREE/101019858/talks-continue-on-detroit-incinerator-sale#

http://www.ecocenter.org/recycling/detroit.php#more

 

 

Who's Online

We have 1431 guests online

Poll

Should legislative term limits in Michigan be extended?
 

About Us

The Michigan Policy Network is a student-led public education and research program to report and organize news and information about the political process surrounding Michigan state policy issues. It is run out of the Department of Political Science at Michigan State University, with participation by students from the College of Social Science, the College of Communication, and James Madison College. 

Read more about us...

Sponsors

Michigan State University Department of Political Science College of Communication Arts & Sciences James Madison College College of Social Science University Outreach and Engagement

The thoughts, opinions, and positions represented herein are solely those of the participating students and in no way represent an official position or policy recommendation of Michigan State University.

Our sponsors...

Meet your Policy Fellow

Anonymous and Natalie Tononi serve as energy and environment policy correspondents for the Michigan Policy Network. Natalie is a first-year student in Lyman Briggs College at MSU.

Michigan Policy Network